![]() I've looked into getting the 8-core and updating the CPU myself, but only the 24-core and 28-core options appear to be significantly cheaper to source and do yourself. There are also M.2 options out there that match (and even beat) the U.2 drives on price-per-terabyte, so I'm leaning towards them as a simpler (and more universal) option. I'm totally open to U.2, however I can't find any particularly convenient methods of mounting them internally (no one seems to make a full-length dual-2.5" U.2 PCIe card) and having to jury-rig a mounting solution whilst running the cables to U.2 adapters seems awkward. Other than that, I see no problems with your configuration. I only point this out because you mentioned that you work with a lot of RAW material, apart from RED (in near future), most of them are still using CPU to process the image. So you could potentially save some money there if you just buy it from some thrid party vendor and install yourself and then sell the 8core the base model came with. But you can actually get it from third-party vendors for much cheaper than what Apple is currently charging. So the CPU in the new Mac Pro is actually upgradable as you might already know. but I'm just gonna put it out there and you can decide if it's something you wanna pursue. ![]() The only other thing I can think of right now is the CPU, and I'm not sure if it's something you are comfortable with upgrading since it requires some tinkering and a pair of steady hands. I will keep Radeon Pro 580X just in case, and let's be honest, no one is gonna buy that from you anyway Afterburner might not be the best investment for you right now, but I heard they might incorporate RED acceleration in the future so just keep an eye out for it. Radeon vii is a steal right now, so no problem there. My answer is purely from a budget-oriented perspective, so just take that into consideration. Not sure about what kind of project you usually work on, but for me, storage size comes first before any performance increases as long as they are all SSDs. Similar performance, better cooling/longevity and much lower price than m.2 nvme. I do want the 3000MB/s NVME speeds at a minimum.Īny thoughts would be much appreciated (my brains a little frazzled from all the hardware research after years of not being able to consider it!)Ĭlick to expand.I assume the NVME SSD you are talking about is m.2 right? If you are editing locally, I would recommend going for U.2 NVME Enterprise SSD in RAID. But nothing is leaping out at me as offering any significant differences in bang-for-buck. ![]() I’ve been sussing out NF1 and U.2 SSDs (for their higher capacities). So I’d love to hear any suggestions people might have - particularly for cost-effective NVME (or equivalent) storage. The most important thing for me is real-time playback in the Colour page of Davinci (so that I can accurately assess secondary keys and power windows), render times are a distance second place. How does this sound to people? If the Barefeats benchmarks are anything to go by, I gather it should smoke my maxed out 5,1 Mac Pro. 8TB of NVME SSD via the Sonnet or Highpoint 4x NVME cards (are there any other alternatives?) 32GB RAM (which I’ll upgrade to 96GB via 3rd party) Radeon Pro 580X 8GB (is there any value in keeping this in the box alongside the 2x Radeon VIIs?) 1TB of Apple SSD (for boot drive + applications) So now I’m leaning towards the 12-core instead, and using the $1600 AUD I’ll save on the CPU upgrade, to help fund a pair of Radeon VII GPUs (as it seems like having the second GPU is going to improve playback in Resolve, more than the extra 4 cores can).ĭoes this seem like a sensible approach? It’s surprisingly difficult to find much consensus online as to the benefits of higher core counts. But having scoured through CPU benchmarks (particularly the ones posted up by the team at Puget Systems), it seems like the performance advantage it offers in Resolve (over the 12-core Xeon) rarely break single-digit percentages in speed advances. I was initially going to opt for the 16-core, since it seemed like the best price/performance balance. I’m trying to suss out a sensible Mac Pro 7,1 hardware build for Davinci Resolve (since it’s basically where I spend all of my post time these days).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |